Although later than I anticipated, I did finally see 'The Impossible'. Here is what I thought:
The Impossible
Dir - J A Bayona
12A, 114 mins
Disaster films have an odd reputation,
often merely dismissed as popcorn fodder, so it’s strange to have a film billed
as such but to put character and drama over spectacle. Then again, as it’s
based on a true story, it’s probably unfair to label ‘The Impossible’ as such a
movie because the plight of the characters is at its heart throughout the
entire duration. Perhaps this film is best described as a family drama with
elements of disaster, then.
The Boxing Day tsunami was one of those events that put our lives into
perspective, and the film achieves the same feat. Ewan McGregor and Naomi Watts
play the parents of three children who decide to spend an exotic Christmas in
Thailand. Suitcases are unpacked, presents are exchanged, but the sense of
impending disaster is overwhelmingly unsettling. When the inevitable does
happen, the following 15 minutes are intense, realistic and terrifying; an
onslaught of terrific practical effects and incredible sound design. However,
after that concentrated outburst, the drama shifts down a gear to a more intimate,
personal level, which is no less frightful.
That is why this film shines; it’s about the smaller picture. By
focusing on the survival of this one family rather than the scale of the event
itself, a better, and more human, representation of the disaster is displayed.
The performances from the central cast are nothing short of spectacular,
especially Tom Holland, the eldest child, who carries the film for a hefty chunk of the running
time with a gravitas that many older actors would fail to achieve.
Many criticisms have been made in the press about the anglicisation of
the story; in reality, the family was Spanish. To me, that seemed to be a decision to
globalise this story to the maximum amount of people, a decision that was
warranted in my eyes. Thus, the main issue with the film was the score to be
unnecessarily overriding in certain scenes, adding an unwanted sentimentality
to the film. The scenes which worked best were confrontational, uncompromising and,
you guessed it, without a swelling orchestra. Nevertheless, this is a minor
gripe considering that this is a film where tears are wholeheartedly justified.
A realistic, bleak, but ultimately
life-affirming film. Although it doesn’t lack spectacle, what is at its core is
a harrowing portrayal on the personal effects of a natural disaster, rounded
off with terrific performances.
No comments:
Post a Comment